The following is a summary of the minutes from our June 9th
meeting.
Meeting Location: San Mateo City Hall, San Mateo, CA 6:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Meeting Location: San Mateo City Hall, San Mateo, CA 6:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Attendees:
David, Suzanne, Lara, Samya, Fernando, Randy,
Martin, Eric
Guests: Shashi, Leif, Vishal
Suzanne
was the Toastmaster; Samya was the Timer.
Samya held a vote for new officer roles:
·
Sergeant of Arms: Fernando
·
VP of Membership: Martin
·
Secretary back-up: Lara
Everyone passed/was accepted.
Suzanne gave the introduction that this is an
educational session, so that the guests would know the meeting is not normally
like this one. Suzanne explained that
each speaker would present on a meeting role, which is a great introduction to
the roles in each meeting for new members.
Speaker #1:
Martin: The Toastmaster Role
Martin gave a
PowerPoint presentation outlining the pre-meeting responsibilities of the
Toastmaster, indicating that Toastmasters should always plan to arrive early.
The Toastmaster makes
sure we keep to the schedule, introduces the General Evaluator and
speakers. At the closing, the
Toastmaster presents ribbons to the meeting speakers. The Toastmaster has to keep everyone
happy. Martin’s presentation included
key responsibilities and witty images.
Speaker #2:
Fernando: The General Evaluator Role
Fernando gave a
PowerPoint presentation. He began with a
definition that also outlined the beginning, middle and end stages of
responsibilities of the General Evaluator.
Pre-meeting responsibilities include communication with the evaluators
and the Toastmaster.
Fernando emphasized
positive feedback should always be included in the evaluation.
Speaker #3: Trey: The Speaker Role
Trey opened with an
inspirational quote about preparation and its importance to this role. Trey also mentioned that the Speaker should
arrive early. He emphasized the
importance of welcoming the audience when speaking. Trey reviewed the role’s pre-meeting
responsibilities which include letting your Evaluator know the things you want
them to watch out for.
Speaker #4: Randy: The Role of the Grammarian
Randy explained the
Grammarian’s purpose is to listen as people speak and pick up on both good and
bad use of grammar. Randy’s speech was
filled with colorful descriptions to illustrate examples of what the Grammarian
should pay attention to. Randy mentioned
that the Grammarian should work with the Table Topics Master regarding the word
of the day to make sure the word will work with the theme.
Randy said the Grammarian should always write
the word big enough to read from the back of the room. Sample sentences to show use should also be
included. Randy shared a personal story relating his experience with bad
grammar in movies that legitimized the use of bad grammar.
In Aditi’s absence, Suzanne shared some insight
about the role of the Ah Counter, who
counts filler words. Suzanne, being the
Treasurer, mentions that fees are charged to members (up to $1) for the use of
filler words.
Speaker #5: Eric: The Role of the Timer
Eric brought crayons
and directed the audience (all verbally) on drawing a tic-tac-toe grid.
Eric creatively
directed the group to create a grid with columns for the timer’s color cards and
rows for roles, filling in each box with the minutes for minimum, middle and
maximum speaking times.
|
GREEN
|
YELLOW
|
RED
|
TABLE TOPICS
|
1 MINUTE
|
1.5 MINUTES
|
2 MINUTES
|
SPEAKER
|
5 MINUTES
|
6 MINUTES
|
7 MINUTES
|
EVALUATOR
|
2 MINUTES
|
2.5 MINUTES
|
3 MINUTES
|
Eric encouraged
people to think of the Timer as their back-up holding cue cards, not the enemy.
Speaker #6: David: The Role of the Evaluator
David explained the
Evaluator’s role is to “Evaluate to Motivate”, mentioning that this can be
applied to your personal life. David
outlined pre-meeting work: to meet with the speaker you are evaluating, get the
speech criteria. David instructed the
audience to keep using Eric’s crayons and use the flip side of the paper to
draw another grid, 2x2 with: Saw, Heard, Suggestions, Liked.
SAW
|
HEARD
|
SUGGESTIONS
|
LIKED
|
David detailed the
sandwich evaluation technique:
·
Positive(s): saw, heard
·
Suggestion(s): suggestions
·
Positive(s):liked
David mentioned that
too many people white-wash, and says that isn’t as helpful. David said using the sandwich technique is
more helpful. David advised that the
Evaluator should avoid being hypercritical, and says evaluations of Ice
Breakers should be gentler, since it is the first speech project. The purpose is to evaluate to motivate.
Speaker #7: Samya: The Role of the Table Topics Master
Samya improvised the
speech, as she was substituting for Glenn, who was originally signed up for the
role. She mentioned the role of the Table
Topics Master is to state the question, then call on the responder, which
encourages people to pay attention.
Samya emphasized it
is important to answer questions when asked, so participants can improve and also know what it feels like to
give an answer to an unexpected question.
Samya also encouraged people to ask the audience questions randomly.
Speaker #9: Lara: The Vote Counter Role
Lara gave a
presentation on the Vote Counter role, explaining pre-meeting responsibilities
and detailing that the Vote Counter should repeat the criteria for voting when
outlining the Vote Counter role during the meeting.
Samya gave the Timer’s report. Samya assigned roles for the next meeting,
another Educational session that will include evaluations of all the speeches
from this session.
Special meeting roles for next week 6/16:
Toastmaster: Samya
Educational session: Practice the evaluation
·
Martin will be evaluated by David
·
Fernando will be evaluated by Vishal
·
Trey will be evaluated by Eric
·
Eric will be evaluated by Lara
·
Randy will be evaluated by Trey
·
Suzanne (as toastmaster) will be
evaluated by Martin
·
David will be evaluated by Leif
·
Samya will be evaluated by Randy
·
Lara will be evaluated by Suzanne
Martin will be the timer for the whole meeting.
Brenda will do her speech on being the speaker.
No comments:
Post a Comment