Chamber Speakers Circle
Toastmasters
Attendees: Samya, Brenda,
Aditi, Suzanne, Annamaria, Randy, and Martin.
Guests: Monica and Siva
Theme of the
day: Politics
Word of the
day: Indecision
Annamaria
was the Toastmaster; Belinda was the General Evaluator; Randy was the
Grammarian, Belinda was the Ah Counter, and Suzanne was the Timer.
Samya
started the meeting by asking the guests to express why they came to
Toastmasters
Speaker #1: Martin:
“What’s our Communication Style?”
Martin
began by stating that we each have our own unique way of speaking which
include:
·
Body Language
·
Words we use
·
Energy Level
·
Eye Contact
The way we
speak also sends signals to people so they can figure out who we are by our
conclusions, intentions, and dreams.
This can also lead the listener to form judgments and perhaps even cause
conflicts. Words are only 7% of our
means of communication. Conflicts can be
avoided when we are able to send clear messages to people.
Martin
then went into Brown’s “Just Do It” method for success, called “Signals Brown
Tends to Project”. He described the four
colors that show our basic personality characteristics. It was fascinating and allowed the audience
to identify with different ones. Martin
ended by suggesting that “We all could learn how to be more receptive.”
Speaker #2: Samya: Advanced Communicator Manual. Giving an Interview.
Samya had
an interview set up with Aditi as the interviewer. They set it up as a morning talk show with
Aditi asking questions and Samya answering.
The topic was about Samya’s new Book, The Philosophy and Science of Yoga:
5,000 Years in the Making.
It was a
lively interview, which went over many interesting facts about the book. Samya expressed how she had spent many months
in the Himilayas obtaining her training.
Samya also gave us many insights into how to “Self-Expression”.
Table
Topics: Aditi was the Table Topics
Master. Questions were asked around the theme of “Politics”. She used the “key word” method to have us
express our points of view.
Belinds
called on her team of evaluators.
Evaluator
#1: The Round Table evaluation
method was used. Martin was very
polished and professional in his presentation.
It was a fascinating topic that held our interest, very pertinent. Martin gave us a lot of information with good
attention to detail. He is a natural
speaker and uses soothing tones and voice modulation.
Some of
the suggestions were:
·
Use the space a little more, (This was hard because the remote was not
there for the power point.)
·
Laminate the papers he used of the color
characteristics.
Overall,
Martin gave a very personable, natural, and genuine presentation using good eye
contact. He was very powerful and
commands the attention of his audience.
Evaluator
#2: The Round Table evaluation
method was used. Samya had good
projection and looked into the camera.
The members were excited to see how the advanced manual speeches were
given. Samya had great eye contact, was
smiling and had a friendly tone. She
seemed at ease and knowledgeable of the topic.
There was
good chemistry between the interviewer and the interviewee, “Synergy”. The questions appeared to put the speaker at
ease. Some suggestions were:
·
When Samya comes to important points in her speech
to pause and speak more slowly to emphasize this.
·
Have less comprehensive questions so the answers
could be shorter. There was a lot of
valuable information and it is important to let the audience keep up.
Samya gave
us eight steps to work with the techniques, which were well thought out and
very informative. The interview was
excellent and we all learned valuable insights into Yoga.
No comments:
Post a Comment